Words for my thoughts

Indians and Politics

Posted by Alok on February 9, 2008

This may be a very contentious issue to be tinkered with but what’s the point in trying to tame a meek goat when it would be much more fun to fight with a raging bull. So let me try to control this bull with some logical points which may not go down so easily with everyone, and for the rest take these words with a pinch of salt as is generally done with Tequila shots for reasons know to everyone.

The linkage and affection of politics and Indians is almost as old as that of earth and sun. As no one can comment on “Who came first, chicken or egg?” nothing conclusive can be said about this issue also. The recorded history shows Rama being sent to exile by the political Keykayi, this may be the first instance of politics ever played but who knows what happened before that. The affection of Indians with politics can be attributed to many reasons some of which I would enumerate here.

1) 1) Inherent tendencies to think: Right from our childhood we see people fighting and politicizing against each other, day in and day out. An innocent child learns politics from his mother and grandmother politicizing against each other, the father and his boss politicizing against each other. He grows up in such an incubative environment that it is difficult for him to resist his newly developed instincts from trying on people around him on the first chance he gets to use.

2) 2) Extreme amount of free time: Plenty of people don’t have much to do in their day to day lives. Result, they start thinking laterally, on issues which don’t affect them, issues which are irrelevant for them. Twisting and bending each fact becomes a source of enjoyment in their otherwise boring and wretched lives. The fun to do something wrong to an unsuspecting person is something which they strive for. Rumor mongering is a favorite pass time of good for nothing people who can otherwise do nothing constructive in their eternal free time.

3) 3) The tendency to have an opinion on everything: How many of us don’t think that they can be a better prime minister than Manmohan Singh or a better cricketer than Sachin? Almost all of us believe that whatever is happening is wrong and could have been better if they were allowed to pour in their invaluable contribution towards everything. This is not only true for bigger things like these but also for much smaller and inconsequential things like student body functioning or even the working of a non-profit volunteer club. So awesome people try to become more awesome by criticizing the lesser awesome incumbent members of each organization.

4) 4) The tussle of mediocrity and meritocracy: Again a live wire to touch, but people who are mediocre and more importantly themselves believe that they are mediocre try to fight merit by the only possible way which is the political way. Equitable distribution is their slogan since distribution on merit is something which would leave them starving and naked on the street. Result, targeted political attacks on people who don’t even need to be political, their merit would take them places they want to reach, places which these people can only day dream of.

The truth of these statements is reflected in the amount of tussle for every student body election in every university, be it at graduate level or post-graduate level. These tussles sometimes become very poisonous as seen every year in DU elections with violence marring the democratic process. The love of politics and power is so ingrained in each one of us, that we make sure to live up to them even outside India. A simple look at other universities outside India would show the manpower we have in their student bodies. This may be good or bad, that is an issue we are not debating on. The issue is the preference this thing takes over primary academic activities. Some people might argue that had it not been the case we wouldn’t have had so many politicians, after all almost all of them started their political career from DU only. And who knows, it may have been better for our country.

Nobody could escape the ever growing sphere of influence of politics and politicians. If lord Rama couldn’t escape the politics played by his own mother, who are you and me to even think of escaping it. I have poured in my opinions about this issue in front of you, after all you see; even I have an opinion about things. Think twice before liking them or hating them, for this is a total non-political effort in putting in my opinions.

11 Responses to “Indians and Politics”

  1. abc Says:

    biggest crap

  2. Alok Says:

    Mr Abc, any reasons why?? 2 lines instead of two words could help more.

  3. a dreamer Says:

    And toe, leg, stomach, hands, head and hair[though my hair is thin!]are all part of body and mouth is upper part of body but it feels pain of toes….and a body,family,community,society,nation…part of a system[hey I am not telling one can be neutral!one can but how?]……so comment!

  4. Neel Says:

    Will quote a dialogue from movie Nayak “sab kehte hai politics ek gutter hai par koi us gutter mein utar kar use saaf nahi karna chahta”

    its a shame that a child doesnt ever aspire to be a politician as it is perceived to be a corrupt occupation… and the irony is that we learn and play politics at every front at every instance of our life…

    following isnt very much related to the post of urs… but its on politics and democracy, more so at the national level… am copy-pasting one of my friends write-up here.. i know its not a good medium or the right channel but ur blog gets many visitors and didnt wanna miss out on reaching to them…

    USA has a habit of taking democracy seriously; implementing it within the country and enforcing on other countries too. The latter issue is not the point of discussion right now. One of the most important benefits that citizens get in a democracy is the right to vote, right to select the government. Each party comes up with their own manifesto, mostly similar, but then there are few issues which differentiate the parties. However, is the right to select just the party enough?

    Now, as indicated earlier, USA takes democracy seriously. It has a wonderful system where people get a chance to select the presidential candidate, besides getting to select the party eventually. The process has evolved over years and now referred to as “caucus”, to determine the primaries for the presidential race. Caucuses are held in select states, and common people vote for a candidate for their party (the literal and older meaning of caucus means a gathering of each party’s local political activists during the presidential nomination process). The caucuses result in 2 candidates, one from the Republican Party and one from the Democratic who fight it out for the ultimate post.

    Now this process is long and expensive, but it provides several opportunities. Current predictions suggest that the next president of USA would be a woman (Hillary Clinton) or an African-American (Barack Obama), a first time even for a supposedly open society. This wouldn’t have been possible without the present system. The underrepresented sections of the society see a silver lining of their voices being heard. Also, this process harps on increasing transparency and removing inefficiencies from the system arising from too much inclusion of corporate lobbying and loyalty to moneyed or powered elite.

    The president or the prime minister (incase of India) is the mirror of the nation. He represents the country abroad, should have leadership as well as diplomatic skills. He should be able equally at ease in connecting with the common man of his own country as well as leaders abroad.

    Now India is also a democratic country; huge and vibrant and what we have in India is of course better than China where leader of the country is decided behind closed doors and forced upon the people. But at a more subtle level, the difference isn’t much. Indians definitely get to vote their own MPs and hence play a crucial role in the government that comes to power, but as far as choosing the leader is concerned, we get no options. During last general elections, it was a surprise till the last day, and eventually Manmohan Singh was chosen by Sonia Gandhi. It is plain fortune of the people of India that Manmohan Singh happens to be Oxford and Cambridge graduate. But it could have been anybody. In past we have had leaders like H.D. Devegowda, P.V. NarsimhaRao, and I.K. Gujral etc. who could hardly connect to the common man in India. Devegowda and Narsimha Rao were far too inaudible to connect to leaders abroad. Later, we had A.B. Vajpayee, who though a great statesman had problems with regular conversation (his pace has been a widely recognized irritant for foreign leaders). For a leader to command respect within and outside the country, lot of characteristics are required which definitely lack in prime ministers elected dynastically or through aristocratic connections etc.

    These examples suggest that the process in India needs a change. India is a diverse country, but the diversity can definitely be classified in four zones: East, West, North and South, and a party can have a caucus kind of process in each of the zones. Politicians are selfish and usually oppose any change, but such a process would also help them gauge public response to the popularity of their party as well as their chosen candidate. The complications arising from this can be rebellion within the party, but such changes have to happen slowly. If any political party shows courage to plan this, then it would spread like wildfire (parties might even be forced to follow suite) and eventually people as well as the parties would be able to digest the entire process and see the long term benefits. It might be easier for a newer and smaller political party to implement this rather than such an idea being lost in committees formed by old corrupt heads of Congress or BJP. This would be an innovative chapter in Indian democracy, and our constitutional heads or the election commission have to be strengthened to move forward in this direction. However, most importantly, such an inclusion of common man in the process would result in increased awareness about the issues that really affect our lives and probably in steps being taken in that direction.

    CHEERS :)

  5. Alok Says:

    Neel Dude, that indeed was awesome and thanks for putting it here.

    And to Mr. Dreamer, why do u need to use fake names and websites and email ids? Whom do you fear of in coming out in open? The blog never names or points towards anyone. And seriously dude, the last comment of yours as incomprehensible as Russian is to me. Cant make head, toe or tail of it.

  6. sandeep gupta Says:

    Alok as usual another hottie :)

    However just a couple of things that sounded dissonant to me
    “An innocent child learns politics from his mother and grandmother politicizing against each other”
    I think the amount of instances that don’t follow this pattern are also not few, secondly chance of the child hating such scheming is also not insignificant.

    Secondly
    “How many of us don’t think that they can be a better prime minister than Manmohan Singh or a better cricketer than Sachin?”
    I hope you are not alluding to a time where whatever anyone does shouldn’t be questioned. In case of politics it shows a strong sense of awareness that people of India have. Criticism can be handy and by attacking this instinct dont you think that we may be leading ourselves into a dark hole.

    As for sachin and cricket, dude i pay to see them, i got full right to criticize. Somehow praise is taken is a hygiene factor by cricketers then whats the harm in criticizing. As for being able to do it better and all; well they are there because they were perceived to do that thing better than others, surely whichever place you are you expect to be criticized if you dont do justice to it.

    As for mediocratic vs meritocracy; i guess we need to take a longer term view of the whole situation. You can’t just move away by saying that you mediocres do this or that. the fact is that they are a part of this country and do what any one may consistent derision of their thinking would only lead to more division; this is specially significant in view of the fact that the alternative methodology of providing high class education,which could help resolve this issue peacefully, is not being done due to “politics”. but sadly the politics isnt something that these so called mediocres are playing.

  7. Gaurav Says:

    Hi Alok.

    You seem to be hating politics… Though i do not have that much brains to be ‘in’ politics, and have many times felt to be victimised when i was absolutely right; but still i feel its necessary.
    I would start trying to define it. Politics is something what you say or do when you want to get something done by somebody. Somebody in everygroup (read- society,organisations..) needs to work. And who that person would be…. is decided by politics. Indeed , politics is nothing but application of certain already established rules(be it on social level), in a way to get things done.I assume this keeps rumors and all that stuff aside.. coz u can catch them and if you want u can correct them.

    In short, it is generalized as “who gets what, when, why, and how.”
    So you can never be out of politics… if you try to be then u will find yourself self sacrificing. And every body in every society is fighting for his/her needs. So , is more-or less in politics to get needs fulfiled.

    India being country with scarce resources , sees extreme levels of politics; as vast majority of people try to fulfil their basic needs. These very basic needs in US are very much taken for granted. So not much politics at personal level. Though they break heads at a bit higher level.

    By the way — I have an opinion about USA- they are the biggest hippocrites.
    They cry over equality and freedom…. I came to know some days back that till recently they had a law that ‘whites’ can carry a gun and not blacks.
    In my stay here in US i found many things that are different in what they preach and do.

    And best of all– they are afraid of India… there are concerns of India rising so fast in so powerful way!! It is very much possible that India can be a developed nation in next 50 years.

    In the end, good write-up Alok!!

  8. Mayank Sinha Says:

    Alok, u have a tendency to write up controversial blogs even before the issue has died down. :)

    I think that your third point ” Have an opinion about everything” is a good point but I dont get how that plays an essential part in politics being played. As an individual every one of us has the right to have their opinion on issues worldwide. that doesnt mean that people start playing politics. Having an opinion is different from disregarding others opinion, which I feel is wrong.

    And I really find it amusing that the issue of meritocracy and mediocrity comes into play in almost all ur blogs. Politics can be played by people who are mediocre as well as meritorious. Its not that only mediocre people play politics. linking it to the above issue, i have found that its people who think themselves to be meritorious and above the rest have problems accepting others opinion. So, the connectivity between these two points doesnt seem logical.

    And i would like to know how do u define these two types of people. I know where u are hinting but still i dont agree with u on this. Six months is too small time frame to judge the meritocracy of a person. take a longer time frame and u will find that all are almost equal. :)

  9. Alok Says:

    I think its time to post some replies. Let me start in the reverse order of chronology.

    @Mayank: “Having an opinion is different from disregarding others opinion, which I feel is wrong.” Exactly my friend, when ppl start to force their opinions without having a locus standi, then it becomes a problem and that is exactly what i meant. Sitting in your home, u have all the right to critisize the govt or sachin :)

    Regarding the issue of merit, u misunderstood again. Wat i meant was 1) it is one of the reasons and not the only reason, 2) cant u see the linkage in the irrational demands of people for equitable distribution of everything just because they dont have something? This is by no means targeted to anyone but to general junta across the globe. No one is above the rest, its just that when u dont have something which u want dearly but cant afford to, u generally start playing/crying foul.

    My criteria of defining “these” kind of people is very objective and simple. People who work for their goals and may even fail in their attempts are meritorious whereas people who accept that they are not capable of something or worse they dont even try for that but want to reap every possible benefit out of it, are mediocre. People who are afraid of open competition (for everything under the sun) fall into the latter category. Sitting idle and wanting everything is the most disgusting human action one can ever think of.

    And my friend, 6 months is not the time frame which I have taken, i have been living on this earth for 24 years and my vision scopes beyond the immediate surroundings. I have seen life at work and beyond work very closely and all the interpretations are after all those amalgamations.

  10. Alok Says:

    Now reply to Sandeep.

    “An innocent child learns politics from his mother and grandmother politicizing against each other”. Even if he doesnt learn from there, there are infinite Sitcomms being aired and watched with great pleasure in Indian households which serve these things on a platter. An innocent child doesnt have the discretion, and things do leave an impression.

    About the point of having an opinion, I guess i have answered this above. Just dont try to force your opinions on others and u add fuel to the engines of democracy. If majority of people share the same opinion unforcefully, then there is nothing wrong in that.

    Again about mediocres not playing politics, a person is not a mediocre because he doesnt get full education. He is a mediocre because he doesnt want to earn his rights. I am in no way hinting towards any particular section of our society, that is a totally different issue altogether. Rest i have explained my stance towards them in the reply above.

    Hope I clarify the points. But any further comments are welcome for discussion.

  11. human Says:

    Alok,
    Don’t u think u seems to have opinion on everything ? :) or something.

Leave a Reply

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>